Lajwanti – Rajinder Singh Bedi
The chapter Lajwanti by Rajinder Singh Bedi is set in the wake of the
India-Pakistan Partition – specifically, the abduction of women on either side
of the border.
During the Partition, tens of thousands of Hindus and Muslims were
forced to pack and leave, because suddenly, allegiance to one’s country was
based on religion. Families who had been living on the “wrong” side of the
border since generations had to migrate, at moment’s notice, to their
“homeland”. In the midst of all this pain, anguish, separation and large-scale
identity crises, displaced people began attacking the “enemies” – through
thefts, violence and abductions, as was the case with the protagonist Sunder
Lal, and his wife Lajwanti, who was abducted.
In brief, the story Lajwanti is as such:
Sunder Lal, after losing his wife Lajwanti to abductors, and abandoning
all hope of finding her again, put his heart and soul into the rehabilitation
of those women who were abducted and brought back, but not accepted into their
own homes. Sunder Lal urges the families and husbands of these women to
“rehabilitate them into your hearts,” through processions and speeches. He is
supported in this endeavour by many, but faces opposition too, especially from
the orthodox, religious section in society. One day, his brother-in-law sees
Lajwanti in a truck full of abducted women to be returned. Sunder Lal brings
her home and treats her like a goddess, with utmost reverence. However, under
the impression that her fragile heart would break if she were to recount her
“traumatic” experiences, he does not allow her to speak about it. The story
ends with Lajo bemoaning the fact that she had been rehabilitated, yes; but not
accepted.
My analysis of this story is based chiefly on two issues touched upon
in the narrative.
To begin with, the supposed immorality of a woman who had been
abducted, and who did not kill herself instead:
“Couldn’t they have killed themselves? Why didn’t they take poison and
preserve their virtue and their honour? Why didn’t they jump into a well? They
are cowards, they clung to life…”
The author goes on to describe how some of the women who had been
returned were not acknowledged by their husbands, brothers and parents, for
fear of God, or worse, society.
Such situations had arisen because of the ignorance of the people at
home, who hadn’t been abducted, who hadn’t gone through what the abducted did,
and who did not understand that it was not the abducted that were immoral – it
was the abductors that were lecherous. They could not understand the futility
of killing yourself for honour, or rather people’s perception of it. Rajinder
Singh Bedi addressed this issue in Lajwanti, because he wanted society to see
how their loved ones who did not commit suicide would be treated.
The second issue I will address here is the interpretation of the holy
texts to either prove a point – that the women must not be accepted into their
homes – or to debunk it.
In the story, Narain Bawa and the people at the temple happened to be
discussing the topic of Ram Rajya and how, even the voice of a common washerman
was heard, acknowledged and acted upon by the great king, when Sunder Lal and
his procession was passing by. In rebuttal, Sunder Lal explained how true Ram
Rajya was one where a person neither does wrong to anyone nor suffers anyone to
do him any wrong. He further compares the ejection of Sita from her own home,
with the ejection of the abducted from their homes.
In conclusion, when there is so much pain, on both sides, the people
should have simply stated afresh and rebuilt their lives, with their wives and
sisters and mothers, abducted and brought back and rehabilitated or otherwise.
In class, many valuable points were added on, which I have tried to
list out below:
"Additionally, it must be mentioned that Sunder Lal's behavior was
almost hypocritical. On the one hand, he treats her with utmost kindness, but
on the other, he refuses to give her a chance to talk about her experience."
"The author shows the deification of Lajwanti as Sunder Lal's
attempts to put her up on a pedestal - unattainable, not relatable to - and to
distance Lajwanti from himself, in a cruelly duplicitous manner."
There is more, of course - I'll insert it here when I find it.
Good analysis ..woman remains woman since ages, an object to exploit and hummilate sad
ReplyDeleteNice
ReplyDeleteToo good
ReplyDeletePlease publish next one
ReplyDeleteYes very true thank you for realizing how the women were treated but it was not their fault at all
ReplyDeleteGood object
ReplyDeleteIt is good
ReplyDeleteNice
ReplyDeleteGood
ReplyDeleteGreat description of the chapter in a simple and understandable manner
ReplyDeleteVery nice 👌
ReplyDeleteWell analysed
ReplyDeleteNice
ReplyDelete